Main menu
Secondary menu
You are here
AdreannaDrea's Portrait Collections
Over 200+ male and female portraits, high quality and hand tailored to fit a variety of class and race roles.
I've tried to make sure there's no anime or (heavens forbid) Luis Royo - I was sick of portrait packs being so incredibly filled with junk that I made this one a while ago.
I've handpicked each of the pictures for their quality and suitability to the D&D world. I'll constantly be updating with more as time goes on. Your most likely bet to have up to date packs will be via Steam, as that's where I'm most active - but I'll try and keep this one updated too.
(Disclaimer: I didn't draw any of these. I may have edited a few with minor details such as eye colour, scarring etc, but I didn't do the original work. I found most of them through DeviantArt and merely made them portrait-able. If any of these pieces are yours, and you are not happy for them to be used, please send me a PM.)
CHANGE LOG:
19/05/18 - Added roughly 100 more portraits, 60 odd to the male pack and 40 odd to the female.
25/05/18 - Added 86 new portraits to the male pack. This includes more orcs, goblins and drow, as well as some more general portraits. Also removed a duplicate portrait.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
 Female Pack (625) | 45.04 MB |
| Male Pack (493) | 47.96 MB |
This is a great collection. Thank you for sharing!
Just checked the female-collection
I hope I counted correctly, but I've just seen one violin. Btw. I have no problems with portraits which fit nicely into a d20modern mod.
I've been waiting for this one to hit the Vault! Looks deeelicious! Thank you for sharing with the community!
According to the Vault Voting Standards, "4 - Some Merit, Requires Improvements".
James Dean and Lara Croft? What else will I have to remove to make this usable? Sorry, but modern portraits are not suitable for a D&D world. If you remove all of the modern portraits, I will happily reevalulate and change my vote accordingly.
If you have a portrait pack with a variety of pics that cut across genres, don't advertise it as "suitability to the D&D world". Instead advertise it as something like 'useful for a variety of worlds, cutting across genres, and facillitating mashups' or something like that. TSR and Wizards of the Coast (the original & current owners of D&D) have never conflated modern images with D&D. They have always been careful to to use terms like 'd20 Modern' to call out modern content. D&D as defined by the creators and current owners literally means Dungeons & Dragons. Several games have been based on the D&D rules that are not pseudo-Medieval such as d20 Modern, Gamma World, and Boot Hill but none of them are called D&D. Thus using the name D&D for a cross-genre portrait pack is misleading.
That said, a cross-genre portrait pack is still a pain in the neck. If I want a portrait pack for a modernish Lovecraft adventure, then I have to remove all of the non-modern pics. Whereas if I want to create a D&D adventure, I have to remove the modern pics. And If I want a Weird West adventure, I have to dump the D&D and d20 Modern pics, et cetera.
Therefore due to the inability to use a cross-genre portrait pack without having to modify it, I stand by my vote.
I am fine with all the portraits myself, just because it was created as a D&D game, doesn't mean that ALL worlds are fantasy D&D worlds.. Example, Last jedi, Zombieland etc.
Hey neat, some male portraits that aren't pure beefcakes. Thanks for the pack! :^)
I've only looked at the male portraits since that's what I'm searching for atm. Great stuff, and all of it high quality, good proportions and tasteful. Thank you!
Glad you like them! I've just updated the male pack with almost twice as many portraits as before, so check it out if you'd like more of the same :)